The Deworming Program works to improve health and social outcomes for school-aged children by supporting and promoting schistosomiasis and intestinal worm treatment programs.
What problem is Sightsavers’ deworming programme working on?
Schistosomiasis and intestinal worms are two parasitic diseases found mainly in tropical and subtropical climates — particularly in poor communities without access to safe drinking water and sanitation — that have a detrimental impact on children’s nutrition, health, and education.
Trains and works with local volunteers to facilitate the delivery of treatments and raise awareness about good hygiene practices.
Offers a variety of technical assistance to the governments and NGOs it assists, including promoting community acceptance for mass drug administration programmes and conducting coverage surveys to monitor programme impact.
Conducts research and uses data to inform its decisions.
Sightsavers reports that in the last project year (2023 to 2024), it treated more than 23.4 million children for schistosomiasis and/or intestinal worms.
What information does Giving What We Can have about the cost-effectiveness of Sightsavers’ deworming programme?1.
We previously included Sightsavers’ deworming programme as one of our recommended charities based on Founders Pledge’s recommendation. This recommendation was made on the basis of their internal evaluation of Sightsavers in 2023. Some other information relevant to Sightsavers’ cost-effectiveness is:
Open Philanthropy and GiveWell have awarded several grants to Sightsavers’ deworming programme, with GiveWell awarding $16.9 million in 2023, which is an indicator of its cost-effectiveness.
We’ve since updated our recommendations to reflect only organisations recommended by evaluators we’ve looked into as part of our evaluator investigations and decided to rely on; as such, we don't currently include Sightsavers as one of our recommended programs but you can still donate to it via our donation platform.
Please note that GWWC does not evaluate individual charities. Our recommendations are based on the research of third-party, impact-focused charity evaluators our research team has found to be particularly well-suited to help donors do the most good per dollar, according to their recent evaluator investigations. Our other supported programsare those that align with our charitable purpose — they are working on a high-impact problem and take a reasonably promising approach (based on publicly-available information).
At Giving What We Can, we focus on the effectiveness of an organisation's work -- what the organisation is actually doing and whether their programs are making a big difference. Some others in the charity recommendation space focus instead on the ratio of admin costs to program spending, part of what we’ve termed the “overhead myth.” See why overhead isn’t the full story and learn more about our approach to charity evaluation.
Your current selection
Funds / Organisations you select will show up here